1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation of this case is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the case mentioned in paragraph (2). Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts to be dried;

A. Of the credit transaction agreements concluded from January 2003 to August 2003, 2003, the Plaintiff Company indicated in the debtor column as “Defendant B” on the third page of the judgment of the first instance.

B. On the fourth part of the judgment of the court of first instance, the Defendant A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant A”) appears to be Defendant A.

C. On the 5th page of the first instance judgment, the Plaintiff Company listed in the credit account column in [Attachment 4] No. 11 of [Attachment 4] of June 25, 2009 and details of deposits,” and “Plaintiff C,” respectively, shall be deemed Defendant B, and Defendant C, respectively.

In the first instance judgment, the plaintiff's claim from the 7th to the 10th eth 10th eth eth eth eth eth eth e.

E. On October 25, 2014, the first instance judgment of the court of first instance (hereinafter “the first instance judgment”) stated “from October 25, 2014” as “from October 25, 2009.”

F. On the 8th sentence of the first instance judgment, the term “ordinary deposit account (AD)” in the 16th sentence is raised as “ordinary deposit account (W)”.

G. The part 9 of the judgment of the court of first instance, on the page 16 of the judgment of the court of first instance, “a recipient” shall be considered as “a recipient”.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified and all of them are justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and all of the appeals by the defendants are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.