The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (four months of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the defendant, prior to the final judgment of the relevant case, led to confession and reflects a crime before the judgment of the relevant case became final, and that the equity between the case where the final judgment was committed concurrently with the crime where the judgment became final and conclusive, may be considered when

However, even though the crime of this case was committed by the defendant in the related cases, as if he had caused a traffic accident while driving under influence of alcohol, he had the defendant made a false statement as if he was the victim of the traffic accident, and caused B to give testimony with the above false contents. Such perjury requires strict punishment as a serious crime that interferes with the deliberation of the court for the discovery of substantial truth and causes confusion and uncertainty in the judicial action of the State. B, without receiving any particular benefit from the defendant, the defendant gives a perjury for the defendant, while the defendant actively instigated the defendant without receiving any benefit from the defendant, the defendant is highly likely to be subject to criticism against the defendant, and the defendant has instigated the above perjury to conceal it after driving under the influence of multiple criminal punishments, taking into account the circumstances favorable to the defendant. The sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing of the Supreme Court Decision (6 months to 16 months) of the Sentencing Committee (the sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing Committee) is related to the crime for which the judgment became final and conclusive and Article 37 of the Criminal Act is not directly applied, but directly examined as reference materials.

In full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant was sentenced to a punishment against the Defendant by the lower court; and (b) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstances after the commission of the offense; and (c) the sentencing conditions as shown in the trial process, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstances after the commission