logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.09.08 2016노2041
위증교사등
Text

Defendant

All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The punishment sentenced by the court below (the punishment No. 1 and No. 2 in the original judgment: imprisonment with prison labor for 4 months and the punishment No. 3 in the original judgment: imprisonment with prison labor for 10 months) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. The court below rejected the credibility of the statement of perjury in the appellate court of the case in question, although it had a significant influence on the conclusion of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thereby it had a significant obstacle to the appropriate exercise of the state's judicial power in the case. The above perjury was committed during the period of suspension of execution, and the circumstances favorable to the defendant (the fact that the defendant was committed for a considerable period of time during the investigation) and favorable circumstances (the fact that the defendant was found to have committed the crime of altering the official document of this case and uttering the altered official document of this case, which were committed at the same time as the crime of altering the official document of this case, which was already punished in the case of the alteration of the official document of this case, which affected the conclusion of the judgment, which did not affect the conclusion of the judgment of the court below, and which did not require any special consideration of the circumstances other than the circumstances of the defendant's age or the changes in the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act.

Defendant

We do not accept the prosecutor's assertion.

3. Conclusion, the appeal by the Defendant and the Prosecutor is all filed.

arrow