A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 21, 2017, at the defendant's office located in Geumcheon-gu, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, written each part of "E", "F in Seoul Special Metropolitan City," "F in Seoul Special Metropolitan City," and "201704/21" in the name of the manager, and then printed out and issued before the date of inspection, the defendant forged one copy of a certificate of confirmation of the mechanical parking lot inspection in the name of the chief executive officer of the Korea Transportation Safety Authority, which is an official document, and sent it by facsimile as if the "certificate of verification of the mechanical parking lot inspection", which is forged in the name of the chief executive officer of the Korea Transportation Safety Authority, was duly formed, by using the Korean language program at the defendant's office located in Geumcheon-gu, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. Application of a copy of a certificate verifying the use of a mechanical parking lot;

1. Article 225 of the Criminal Act (the point of Article 25 of the Official Document) and Articles 229 and 225 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (the point of uttering of forged official document);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [the scope of recommendation] / forgery, alteration, etc. of official documents, etc. / there is no basic area (the period from August to two years) (the person subject to special sentencing) / [the sentence] / The crime of this case is a crime damaging the public trust in relation to official documents, and its nature is not good.

However, in light of the favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant acknowledges and reflects the crime, the issuance of a certificate of confirmation of the prosecutor by the administrative office after the crime of this case, and the absence of the record of punishment for the same kind of crime, etc., the punishment shall be determined as ordered by taking into account the motive and circumstance of the crime and the circumstances after the crime.