A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who operates a milk production farm under the trade name of “E” in Ansan City D.

On November 21, 2016, the Defendant, without authority, forged, on June 24, 2015, the water quality inspection report in the name of the head of the Gyeonggi University Environmental Analysis Center, which was issued by the Korea National University Environmental Analysis Center on June 24, 2015, on “ June 24, 2015”; the “payment” of the inspection item, as “general fece”; the “water quality standard item” below 0.1 ml/L” below 0.1 ml/L, as “CFU/ml”; and written it as “CFU/ml” below 100 ml/L, and written it in the original form and attached it by entering it in the official document.

2. On November 23, 2016, the Defendant sent a forged official document to a person in charge of the name in the name of the deputy head office of the Agricultural and Forestry Quarantine Headquarters, among the regional head offices of the Agricultural and Forestry Livestock Quarantine Headquarters, who is unaware of the fact, as if the record of water quality inspection was duly prepared in the name of the head of the Gyeong University at the same place as the above paragraph 1, at the same time as the above paragraph 1.

Accordingly, the defendant exercised forged official documents.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. A written accusation;

1. Original of water quality testing records and altered water quality testing records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigation report (the currency of staff of the border analysis center at Korea National University);

1. Article 225 of the Criminal Act (the point of Article 25 of the Official Document) and Articles 229 and 225 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (the point of uttering of forged official document);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (within the scope of the recommended sentencing criteria) of the suspended sentence;

1. Application of the sentencing criteria [Scope of the recommended punishment] and the mitigation area (type 1) of non-business, non-business, and non-organizational (type 1);

2. Determination of sentence: (a) all of the instant crimes, such as: (b) recognition of all of the instant crimes; (c) recognition of contingent crimes; and (d) passing lawful water quality inspection;