logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.09.13 2018가합503649
양수금
Text

1. The defendant is within the scope of property inherited from the deceased B (C) and KRW 314,852,272 among them and KRW 66,465 among them.

Reasons

1. The description of the grounds for the claim and the grounds for each modified claim shall be as specified in the attached Form;

(However, among the grounds for the claim, “creditor” is the Plaintiff, “debtor B” is the deceased B, and “debtor B” is the deceased B and D. With respect to D, payment order was finalized on December 5, 2017. On December 2, 2017, Article 208(3)2 and Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act applicable mutatis mutandis to the applicable provisions of the Civil Procedure Act (i.e., Supreme Court Decision 2015Mo32 Decided February 32, 2015) against the Plaintiff seeking the performance of his/her inheritance obligation, the Defendant initially raised a defense of limitation of liability due to qualified acceptance (i.e., the Busan Family Court 2015Mo32), but thereafter, did not dispute the Plaintiff’s modified claim without attending the date for pleading.

arrow