logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.01.17 2017가합37114
양수금
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant M shall be either KRW 761,221,075 and its importance within the scope of the property inherited from the net N (O).

Reasons

1. The grounds for application for the indication of the claim and the grounds for each modified claim shall be stated in the attached Form;

(2) The Defendants did not dispute the change of the Plaintiff’s claim without attending the date of pleading when the Plaintiff received the aforementioned defense and sought a reduction of the inherited property within the scope of inherited property. (3) Item 2 of Article 208(3) and Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act applicable mutatis mutandis to the applicable provisions of the Civil Procedure Act on December 2, 201, when the Plaintiff sought the performance of inherited property, the Plaintiff had a protest of the limitation of liability due to the qualified acceptance (Seoul Family Court Decision 2017Mo2080, Suwon District Court Decision 2016Mo2081, Suwon District Court Decision 2018Mo824, Suwon District Court Decision 2018Ma824).

arrow