1. The part of the judgment of the court below against Defendant A is reversed.

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

Defendant .

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Although Defendants 1 and 2 had expressed the desire for H, Defendant A, and 2 did not assault H or I, Defendant C had a fluorous fact that Defendant C had a h’s shoulder once, which constitutes a justifiable act to prevent the threat of H.

B. The sentence of the lower court’s improper sentencing (Defendant A and B: each fine of 2 million won, Defendant C: fine of 3 million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination on Defendant A’s grounds for appeal

A. On May 24, 2017, around 17:00 on May 24, 2017, the Defendants: (a) the summary of the facts charged in the instant case was to control and impose a fine for negligence against the JMW car owned by Defendant A; (b) JMW car owned by Defendant C; (c) Car with the KW car owned by Defendant C; and (d) Defendant C’s h k7 car owned by Defendant B; (d) Defendant C h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h; and (e) Defendant B h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h.

The Defendants conspired as above and interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties concerning the crackdown on illegal spirits by official officials of the Gu office.

2) The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the aforementioned facts charged by comprehensively taking account of the witness I and H’s respective legal statements, video reproduction CDs, etc.

3) The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, i.e., the regulation of parking at the time of the lower judgment:

H In an investigative agency, three defendants were jointly able to take a bath, and they were assaulted by defendants B and C.

The statement (33 pages of evidence records), 2. At the time.