beta
Text
Defendant
A 1 and 2.A, 2.B.
⑵㈎죄에 관하여 징역 1년 6월, 판시 2.나.
⑵㈏죄에 관하여 징역...
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On June 8, 2010, Defendant A was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Central District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 15, 201, and the period of parole on October 28, 2011 during the execution of the sentence at the Gansung Vocational Training Correctional Institution was paroled on October 28, 201, and the parole period expired on December 6, 201.
Defendant
B On January 6, 2012, the Busan District Court sentenced two years to imprisonment for fraud, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 26, 2012.
2. Criminal facts;
A. The Defendants’ fraud (2012 senior group7257) (hereinafter “Defendant B”) committed an act under the direction of the victim H’s work, and Defendant B, on May 2006, intended to borrow some funds from the victim H when Defendant A engaged in the business of purchasing the Yeongdeungpo-gu site, but the remainder of the funds was not raised, thereby creating a false real estate sales contract without permission, thereby making a false real estate sales contract to borrow money from the victim.
On May 11, 2006, the Defendants also purchased and sold the real estate in advance because there is a lot of possibility that K will be incorporated into the project site, and then sold the real estate to the victims at the Jac shop located in the Jung-gu Busan Metropolitan City (hereinafter referred to as the “instant real estate”) in order to implement the apartment construction project in the vicinity of L and M land and building in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter referred to as the “instant real estate”). The Defendants concluded a contract to purchase the instant real estate and paid the down payment of KRW 100 million for the remainder of the intermediate payment, and presented a sales contract for the said real estate by selling it within two months as the remainder of the intermediate payment.
However, in fact, the defendants did not enter into a sales contract for the real estate, and the sales contract presented to the victim was a false document, and the victim was planned to receive money from the victim to use it as living expenses.