The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The court below erred by misapprehending the facts in finding the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case, although all of the Defendant posted a notice by the Defendant (the fact-finding) is true and false.

B. The prosecutor (e.g., 6 months of imprisonment and 2 years of suspended execution) of the lower court is deemed to be too uneasible and unfair.

2. Judgment on the defendant's assertion of mistake of facts

A. According to the evidence duly examined and adopted by the court below, ① the Defendant cultivated crops in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan City G G, ② the Defendant was subject to a disposition to impose indemnity on the ground that he occupied the above land without permission from the head of Songpa-gu, ② the payment of indemnity was caused by the victim SH Corporation, etc. as a result of the payment of indemnity, ③ the Defendant connected the Internet portal (www.daum.t) after the Internet portal around June 28, 201, to the free bulletin board of “Agora,” with D’s ID, and conducted a survey of the maintenance of the Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan City G zone, and conducted a survey of the maintenance of the land of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, and conducted a public official of Songpa-gu 2, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 20, 20,000, 30,000).