The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. A summary of the grounds for appeal on July 5, 2012, the council of occupants' representatives did not decide to use valves as materials, and it is evident that the victim committed a corruption as a managing office. The defendant stated the facts as it is, and did not indicate false facts, and the defendant's act is not for the public interest. It does not constitute a crime because it is for the benefit of the general public.

(In full view of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the court below held that the Yeonsu-gu Incheon council of occupants' representatives was convened on July 5, 2012; the above meeting was present at each of the nine representatives including the defendant (N, defendant, H, I, J, K, F, L, and M); the chairperson of the committee stated that "the water system is a valve and the fire fighting is OSY is made a valve" in the above meeting; the victim did not object to the above resolution; the victim used a valve as a material and there was no objective material that the victim committed corruption, and the defendant was present at the council of occupants' representatives and recognized the facts known to the contents of the resolution.

According to the above facts of recognition, it is recognized that the defendant distributed printed materials with the contents of "the victim's arbitrary use of expensive materials," and posted a letter to the same effect on the motor vehicle, knowing that the defendant's falsity is false, thereby damaging the victim's reputation by openly pointing out false facts, and it cannot be deemed that the contents of the above printed materials are true facts, and therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.