1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the parts to be filled or added below, and thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The 7th 10-11 letter of the first instance judgment "this court" shall be applied to "the first instance court".

The 8th 10th 10th 10th 10th 10th 1 of the judgment of the first instance (hereinafter referred to as the "land in this case") states "where the land in this case has lost its function as farmland, the farmland law can order the person who has committed the act to restore the farmland to its original state within a fixed period without obtaining permission to divert farmland or permission to temporarily use farmland for another purpose (hereinafter referred to as "farmland diversion permission, etc."), and where the farmland in this case has been diverted to its original state or used for another purpose, etc., the competent agency shall order the person who has committed the act to restore it to its original state (Article 42 (1) and (2)). In the event that the order to reinstate is not fulfilled, the competent agency shall restore the farmland to its original state to its original state if the land in this case has been unlawfully diverted to another purpose without obtaining permission to divert farmland, etc., and if it has to be restored to its original state as farmland, it shall still be deemed to fall under "farmland" (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2005Du5484.).).

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.