logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.05.17 2017고단772
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No person shall arrange, etc. sexual traffic for business purposes, in violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts;

Nevertheless, from January 7, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 180 square meters, installed shower facilities in a space of approximately 180 square meters in Siri-si, Siri-si; (b) operated a sexual traffic business establishment with the trade name of “C”, equipped with four facilities in the atmosphere room; (c) around February 6, 2017, the Defendant received 110,000 won from the police officer D who pretended to enter the customer; and (d) assisted the sexual traffic business by sending the shower facilities into E who is a female employee.

2. No person who violates the Educational Environment Protection Act shall do any act or install any facility publicly notified by the head of a female family in an educational environment protection zone for the health, safety, learning, and educational environment of students;

Nevertheless, from January 7, 2017 to February 6, 2017, the Defendant installed four smugglings, which are business facilities publicly notified by the head of women's family (No. 2013-52), and operated commercial sex acts against customers with the name of customers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each control site photograph;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Arranging Sexual Traffic (the occupation of arranging sexual traffic for business purposes), Articles 16(1) and 9 of the Act on the Protection of Educational Environment (the occupation of prohibiting acts within an educational environment protection zone), and choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of not less than Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., confession of the defendant, and the fact that the defendant has no penalty exceeding a fine).

arrow