1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. According to the record as to the legitimacy of the subsequent appeal, since the document of lawsuit, including a copy of the complaint of the court of first instance, and the original copy of the judgment, are served to the defendant by means of service by public notice, and the defendant becomes aware of the fact that the defendant was not aware of the lawsuit of this case and the pronouncement of the judgment of the court of first instance, it can be recognized that the subsequent appeal of this case was

2. Basic facts

A. C has employed women in the E located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “instant business establishment”) to engage in commercial sex acts, and had them lend money for advance payment from the Plaintiff named as “F” and had them repay the aforementioned advance payment to all business establishments, and employed commercial sex acts women by having them repay the aforementioned advance payment obligation as a commercial sex acts.

B. The Defendant was to work at the instant business establishment on August 2002 upon the introduction of pro-Japanese, and the Plaintiff lent KRW 25 million to the Defendant (hereinafter “instant loan”), and the said KRW 25 million was used to return the advance payment to the Defendant’s pre-paid workplace.

C. Meanwhile, the Plaintiff, other than the Defendant, lent money to G, H, etc. under the pretext of advance payment, and collected interest, etc. on the instant business establishment from time to time.

Defendant, G, and H engaged in sexual traffic several times a day at the instant establishment.

E. At the time of the instant lending, the Defendant was only 20 tons, and the Plaintiff lent 25 million won to the Defendant who did not live in 20 years without collateral.

[Reasons for Recognition] The entry of Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 7, the testimony of witness G of the trial party, and the purport of the whole pleadings

3. The assertion and judgment

A. With respect to the Plaintiff’s claim for the payment of the instant loan and damages for delay, the Defendant received the instant loan as a prepaid payment in work at a sexual traffic business establishment operated by C, which goes against good morals and other social order.