1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The amount received as a result of the successful bid on the monthly payment date of the raw materials for the settlement of accounts as of December 27, 2007; and the amount received as of March 27, 2009; 16.300 on January 26, 2008; 1, 450 3,050 on February 11, 2008; 11, May 11, 2009; 50 16, 300 16, 308. 8. 6. 8213, 679 ; 3. 5. 15, 2008; 5. 8. 4, 2008; 5. 8. 8. 6. 5, 2008; 5. 8. 15. 15, 2009;

A. The Defendant subscribed to each successful bidder listed in the following [Attachment 1] operated by the Plaintiff and received a successful bid, and received a balance after deducting the bidder from the Plaintiff, but paid the balance to the Plaintiff each month by the end of the pertinent successful bid.

B. In addition, the Defendant joined each successful bidder listed in the [Attachment 2] set forth below operated by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant successful bidder”) and received a successful bid, and received a prize from the Plaintiff after deducting the bidder’s interest, and paid a balance to the Plaintiff not later than the end of each month of the pertinent successful bidder’s award, and written up each letter (hereinafter “each of the instant papers”) stating such details.

On March 28, 2008, 600: (a) the receipt date of the monthly advance payment as the successful bid date of the head of the mutual advance payment system; and (b) the receipt amount of the advance payment; (c) November 27, 2008; (d) November 3, 2008; (d) June 3, 2008; and (e) November 3, 2008; (e) 40016; (d) November 31, 2008; and (e) August 31, 2008; (e) June 4, 2014; and (e) June 9, 2008; and (e) June 1, 2008; and (e) June 30, 2008; (f) June 9, 2008; (f) the receipt date of the advance payment; and (f)

C. After the Defendant received the award from the successful bidder as indicated in [Attachment 2] No. 9 on January 16, 2009, the Defendant did not pay the Plaintiff each payment of the instant successful bidder after receiving the award.

[Ground of recognition] There is no dispute, and there is no dispute over the part of Gap evidence 1-1-4's signature, and therefore the authenticity of the entire document is presumed to have been established.

The defendant's evidence Nos. 1-2 and 2 shall be signed and delivered in blank state, and the contents thereof shall be different.