logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2015.12.18 2015고단2484
배임등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Judgment of the court below]

1. On November 23, 2007, the Defendant in breach of trust is the lead of the 16 successful bidder to the amount of KRW 48 million, organized in D markets located in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul.

From November 23, 2007 to November 22, 2008, the Defendant received 36 million won under the pretext of a total of 12 times from the victim E (the age of 48, the age of 48 to November 22, 2008). On December 23, 2008, the Defendant agreed to pay 48 million won to the victim a total of 12 installments.

Nevertheless, the Defendant violated his duties and did not pay an advance payment to the victim and incurred property damage by escaping around that time, and operated five successful bidders at the same time, such as the attached Table 1, and did not pay the advance payment to the nine victims, and did not pay the advance payment to the nine victims, thereby obtaining the pecuniary benefits of KRW 360,5960,000 through ten times.

【2015 Highest 2816】

2. On April 13, 2007, the Defendant, in occupational breach of trust, was engaged in the business of collecting and paying the total amount of money to the members and paying the total amount of money of KRW 60 million,000,000,000, organized in D markets located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

From April 13, 2007 to August 13, 2008, the Defendant received KRW 51 million from the Victim F for a total of 17 occasions of payment from the Victim F, and thus, the Defendant had a duty to pay KRW 60 million to the Victim on September 13, 2008, which agreed to grant a successful bid and set a balance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, in violation of his duties on September 13, 2008, did not pay the guidance money to the victim and incurred property damage by escape around that time, and did not pay the guidance money to the two victims who cause the guidance by the same method as the attached Table 2 around that time, and did not pay the guidance money to the two victims who cause the guidance by the same method as the attached Table 2. Thus, the Defendant acquired a total of KRW 322,50,000.

arrow