The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On January 2, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 10:40 on January 2, 2013, 2013, at the drum practice hall operated by the victim D (the age of 44, n) under the ground of C building, and (b) determined that “the victim was locked, but the victim was locked,” and the Defendant was working at the drum practice hall, and said drum event was a dispute.

The defendant used the victim's tightly, the victim's brupt, the brush, the brush of the brush of the brush, and the brush of the brush of the brush.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are the crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

However, the victim D may recognize the fact that he/she expressed his/her wish not to punish the defendant in this Court on June 18, 2013 after the prosecution of this case was instituted.

Therefore, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.