logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2019.06.25 2019고단284
특수주거침입등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On October 24, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment with prison labor for an injury in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch and 2 years of suspended execution, and the judgment was finalized on November 1, 2018.

【Criminal Facts】

On May 28, 2018, the Defendant was prosecuted for an injury to the victim B (the age of 32) on June 19, 2018, and requested the agreement to the victim on June 19, 2018, and continued to contact with the victim, but the victim refused the agreement and subsequently did not reach an agreement, and the suspended sentence became final and conclusive as above.

1. On August 1, 2018, when the Defendant was aware of the fact that he tried to reach an agreement with the victim with respect to the separate injury case as above, but the victim did not receive telephone, and the Defendant’s scambling and drinking with the Defendant’s scambling in the drinking site, and the Defendant’s scambling of the Defendant’s scambling, which was the victim’s scambling, was sent to the Defendant’s scambling before the Defendant’s scambling, the Defendant scambling and knicked with one brick (a 23 cm, 11 cm, 8 cm thick), which was a dangerous object that the victim’s scambling in the old Sinsi, was found in the Drarization, which was located in the management office, carried with the Defendant’s inner stairs and corridor, which was the common use area’s dwelling.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous things and invaded upon the victim's residence.

2. Intimidation: (a) the Defendant brought the Defendant in front of the front door in order to find out that the Defendant was a female, even if having opened the front door at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), and (b) when the Defendant continued to refuse the Defendant’s request for agreement to the victim who confirmed CCTV after returning home, the Defendant threatened the victim by showing the attitude that the victim would have any harm to the life, body, or property of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1..

arrow