logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2020.11.26 2019고단4264
사기
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months, by a fine of 5,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

On December 9, 2016, A was sentenced to three years of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of fraud at the Sungnam Branch of Suwon District Court on December 9, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 17, 2016.

[Basic Facts and Public Offering Relations] Defendant A, along with his accomplice C, D, and E, placed an advertisement “G” on direct recruitment of “G” (hereinafter “G”) at the F and 2nd floor of Msan City, with the name of his accomplice C, D, and E, placed an advertisement “B” on the daily information page, and intended to obtain a copy of a driver’s license, certificate of personal seal impression, seal, etc. from a large number of unspecified individuals who wishing to be employed and obtain money from an installment financing company by requesting a vehicle installment loan under the name of the company. Defendant A was in charge of information and communication, and C was in charge of organizing and supervising a loan fraud group. D was in charge of information and communication with those who reported the recruitment of driver news advertising advertisement with the company using the temporary name of “I director”, and was employed in the G office, and was in charge of obtaining necessary documents, such as a certificate of personal seal impression and resident registration, and was in charge of collecting documents from other accomplicess such as D, and was in charge of information and communication, and Defendant A was in charge of information and service.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On November 18, 2009, Defendant A, upon receiving C, D, E, and C’s instructions from G office, the Defendant conspiredd to engage in ordinary business at the office as if G were viewed as a normal logistics company in order to pretend that G was a normal logistics company, and intended to forge the loan-related documents from employment applicants to implement the loan.

The defendant is in the G Office around November 18, 2009.

arrow