The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The defendant did not assault the victims of mistake of facts.

B. The sentence imposed by the court below on the grounds of unfair sentencing (the fine of KRW 1,000,000) is too unreasonable.

2. Judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts

A. In full view of the following circumstances: (a) the victim’s assault against the victim C; (b) the victim made a statement from the investigative agency to the court of the court below consistently that he had the victim’s face at the time of the instant case; (c) the victim made a statement from the investigative agency to the court of the court of the court below that he had the victim’s face at the time of the instant case; and (d) the Defendant stated that he had the victim’s face at the time of the instant case consistently from the investigative agency to the court of the court of the court of the court below; and (e) the Defendant stated at the prosecutor’s office that his loss at the time of the instant case had contact the victim’s face; and (e) the Defendant stated that he was the victim’s face

나. 피해자 E에 대한 폭행의 점 살피건대, 기록에 의하여 인정할 수 있는 다음과 같은 사정들 즉, ① 피해자는 원심 법정에서 이 사건 당시 C와 시비를 하는 피고인을 제지하는 과정에서 자신의 뒤에 있었던 피고인이 손으로 자신의 손목을 잡아 밀치고 발로 자신의 허벅지를 걷어찼다고 진술하였으나, 피해자 진술의 취지는 피고인으로부터 폭행을 당했다는 확신이 아니라 다만 뒤에서 걷어차이는 느낌을 받았다는 것에 불과한 점, ② 오히려 피고인과 시비 중이던 C는 원심 법정에서 피고인과 자신 사이에서 피해자가 시비를 말리던 중 피고인이 발로 피해자의 허벅지를 걷어차는 것은 보지 못하였고, 위에서 피고인이 피해자를 폭행한 것은 없었다고 진술한 점, ③ 이 사건 고소장에는 피해자의...