logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2018.01.30 2017고정610
화물자동차운수사업법위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000,000,000,000,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From August 2015 to September 1, 2017, the Defendant received 700 to 800 won per house from E in Kimcheon-si from E, and received 700 to 800 won per day from E’s own truck, and provided a private-use truck for cargo transport at a cost by delivering it to Kimcheon-si, Peace-si, and Chocheon-si, Kimcheon-si for a cargo transport purpose.

2. From March 2, 2015 to September 22, 2017, Defendant C received from the above F, and from E, KRW 700 to KRW 800 per unit of household cargo, and Defendant C received an average of KRW 50 to 60 per day, using his own H Poter truck, and provided a private truck for cargo transport purpose by delivering it to Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si, Mancheon-si, Man-dong, and Namsan-dong.

3. From the early December 2, 2016 to September 22, 2017, Defendant A received from F, and from E, KRW 700 to KRW 800 per unit of selective cargo, and Defendant A provided a private-use truck for cargo transport with an average of KRW 50 per day by using one-day selective truck for his own use.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A written accusation;

1. Application of investigation reports (attached statutes, such as a permit for trucking transport business);

1. Defendants who choose to be subject to applicable provisions of the Act and punishment for facts constituting an offense: Articles 67 subparag. 7 and 56 of the Trucking Transport Business Act and the choice of fines;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

arrow