(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.09.01 2014고단1688

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.09.01 2014고단1688

공무집행방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around October 2005, the Defendant, who was divorced from the victim C (son, 60 years of age) and was married, was found at the victim's house located in the 301 Si government-si Dr. 02:40 on April 10, 2014, and the Defendant was able to find out his house, and the victim was aware that he was in the house, and entered the house without the victim's permission by opening the door.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the victim's residence.

2. At around 03:00 on April 10, 2014, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender by a police officer on the same ground as indicated in paragraph (1) and was in line with the Gu Police Station G zone located in the Gu Government-SiF in the Gu Government. On the same day, around 03:50 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) the police officer assigned to the Gu Police Station G zone in the Gu Police Station in the Gu Police Station in the above G zone and the police officers assigned to the same rank, who called the Defendant to transfer the Defendant’s new illness to the Gu Police Station; (b) the Defendant was arrested as the Defendant’s arms on the part of his house; and (c) the head of the above H’s clothes was taken one time at one time after the police officer went beyond the pressure on the floor; and (d) the police officer continued to assault the Defendant on the ground that the Defendant was unable to wear the Defendant’s failure within the patrol.

As a result, the defendant interfered with police officers' legitimate execution of their duties concerning criminal investigations and transportation of criminals.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement made to C, H, and I;

1. Cd image;

1. It is reasonable to view that the defendant and his defense counsel had the intention to commit obstruction of the performance of official duties, and the defendant and his defense counsel have not committed the crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties. According to the police statements made by each police officer against C, H, and I, CD images and photographs, etc., it is reasonable to view that the defendant had the intention to commit the crime of negligence or obstruction of the performance of official duties. The arrest and arrest of police officers.

유사 판례

-의정부지방법원 2014.11.14 2014고단2908

-의정부지방법원 2014.07.16 2013고단3918

-의정부지방법원 2014.05.02 2013고단3389

-의정부지방법원 2015.04.08 2015고단451

-의정부지방법원 2020.12.14 2020고단2711