logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.05.24 2017가단229900
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Defendant D, E, and F jointly relate to KRW 3,00,000,000 to the Plaintiff, and each of the said money to the Plaintiff B, and C.

Reasons

1. The following facts are found to be without dispute between the plaintiffs and the defendant D, E, G, H, I, and J, or by considering the whole purport of the pleadings as a whole. The above defendant's confession pursuant to Article 150 (3) and Article 150 (1) of the Civil Procedure Act between the plaintiffs and defendant F.

A. The parties’ status and relevant Plaintiff A and K, L, and M are middle students who were affiliated with N Middle Schools in the first and seventh grade in 2017 (hereinafter “instant middle school”); Defendant D and E are parents of K, Defendant F are parents of L, Defendant G, and H; Defendant I was the principal of the instant middle school at the time of the instant middle school, and Defendant J was the first and seventh grade teachers of the instant middle school at the time of the instant middle school in 2017.

B. (i) The occurrence of school violence (hereinafter “school violence in this case”) occurred in early March 2017, K faced with the Plaintiff and sold on the book. However, at the Kakakao Stockholm Group where the Plaintiff was a member of the said Ban, posted a notice to the effect that “Plaintiff A was cut off by drinking,” and “Plaintiff A was cut off by drinking,” and otherwise, when the same Article was made in the early stage of the activities where the Plaintiff was cut off, the Plaintiff was “a person who was fluent,” and “a person who was fluent,” and “a person who was fluent.”

She received 10,00 won from Plaintiff A, and “I have to complete payment,” but the Plaintiff told Plaintiff A, at the place where other sons, to pay the money, and “I are able to do so,” referring to Plaintiff A, and posted on the Kakao Stockholm Organization, “Plaintiff A’s Kakam belt” and “Plaintiff A’s Kakao A’s Kakao Stockholm Organization.”

Reference M provided K with the grounds for the dispute between K and the Plaintiff by stating that “A was able to take a bath while in conversations with another kind of friendship,” and stated that “A will take a bath at a place where another son is born.”

(c).

arrow