1. Defendant D, E, and F jointly share KRW 2,00,000 for Plaintiff A, KRW 500,000 for Plaintiff C, and KRW 500,000 for Plaintiff B.

1. Basic facts

A. Plaintiffs A, Defendant D, and G related to the parties were students of the same rank as the first grade of J Middle Schools. Plaintiffs B and C are the parents of Plaintiff A, Defendant F, and E are the parents of Defendant D, Defendant I, and H.

B. The instant school violence and the instant accident - Defendant D, on June 23, 2017, had the Plaintiff, playing in K and play at the lower part of the class of the first and sixth grade class of J Middle School, avoided D’s luxa, and the Plaintiff was placed on the floor, and the Plaintiff was placed on the floor, followed the Plaintiff’s sexual flag and the vicinity of Sagun.

Defendant D et al., however, even though the Plaintiff was her only, the Plaintiff continued without doing so, but Nonparty D ceased to stop her only due to the fact that Nonparty D was her only.

(hereinafter referred to as the “school violence of this case.” On the other hand, the lower part of the said class is concerned with a stringer when the Plaintiff was placed on the floor due to the school violence of this case, and at the time when the Plaintiff was placed on the floor, Defendant D and Plaintiff A continued the school violence of this case, and Defendant D and Plaintiff A were in the upper part during the duration of the school violence of this case -

However, while the school violence of this case ceased and the plaintiff A was broken down due to a stringer, there was an accident that fit for plaintiff A's knee in the defendant G, who was going back before the classroom while the plaintiff A was broken down.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”. - The instant accident occurred to Plaintiff A on the right-hand side and left-hand side of the troke, resulting in the Plaintiff’s alley surgery more than twice.

C. As a result of the Committee on Countermeasures against School Violence, the Committee held the instant school violence and the instant accident on July 13, 2017, and decided that Defendant D, a student, “seven hours of service in the school, three hours of special education for students, three hours of special education for guardians, three hours of special education for guardians,” “psychological counseling and advice” measures against Plaintiff A, a student, and Defendant G did not constitute school violence because there was no intention in the instant accident.

[Reasons for Recognition]