1. A ship which connects each point of the attached drawings of the attached Form 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 1 among the land size 475 square meters in Ansan-si, Ansan-si.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of the unit D large 331 square meters (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s land”) and the ground housing in Ansan-si, Ansan-si, and the Defendant is C large 475 square meters (hereinafter “Defendant’s land”) and the owner of the ground housing.

B. As seen in the attached drawing, the Defendant’s land is a land in the long-term shape, which is located across the two Koreas. Some of the land in the middle is used as a package, and among the Defendant’s land, the area of 50 square meters in the part of the corporation located within the scope of the ship connected with each point of the attached drawing indicated 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 1 in sequence among the areas of the Defendant’s land (hereinafter “instant land”). The area of 50 square meters in the part of the corporation located within the scope of the ship is a small area with a width of about 2 meters as soil, and a vinyl is installed on the north of the said small area’s land owned by the Defendant, and there is a

C. The instant land has been used for a long time as a passage connected to the Plaintiff’s land, and has maintained the form of passage, and there is no way to pass the instant land to move to a public service with the Plaintiff’s land.

On the other hand, on October 9, 2006, the Plaintiff purchased the Plaintiff’s land owned by the head of Ansan-si, a new house on October 5, 201. At the time of the construction, the Plaintiff completed the construction with the consent to use part of the G land adjacent to the north of the land at issue at issue at issue at issue at issue at issue at issue at the time of the construction.

[Ground of recognition] Uncontentious facts, entries and images of Gap evidence 1 through 10, the result of the survey and appraisal by appraiser H, the purport of the whole pleadings, as a result of the on-site inspection by this court

2. The right of passage over surrounding land as stipulated in Article 219 of the Civil Act, which is judged on the cause of the claim, is at the risk of damage to the owner of the land where the right of passage is exercised for the public interest of using the land without any passage required for its use.