logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2014.10.15 2014누368
유족급여및장의비부지급처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to that of the court of first instance except for the addition of the following matters in the following paragraphs. Thus, it is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of

The second 10th "2012." in the second 10th 10th stm of the judgment of the first instance shall be read as "2010."

It is insufficient to acknowledge that there exists a proximate causal relationship between the deceased’s death and his/her duties solely on the basis of the statements in the evidence Nos. 12 and 13 submitted by the Plaintiff to this court. The testimony by the witness of this court is contrary to the objective data on the deceased’s smoking and drinking.

The decision of the first instance court in the decision is justifiable.

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

arrow