1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to that of the court of first instance, except for the part to be determined additionally in the following paragraphs, and thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article

The second 4th th th st th th th th st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st 2006 unit

The defendant in the second 11st sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be "the head of the Daejeon Regional Veterans Administration", and the defendant in the third 13th sentence shall be "the head of the Daejeon Regional Veterans Administration", respectively, to "the head of the Daejeon Regional Veterans Administration".

The defendant asserts that the plaintiff cannot be deemed to have been admitted to the type No. 2 in addition to the type No. 1 in the complex perjury.

However, in full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the overall purport of the statements and arguments stated in Gap evidence Nos. 12, 13, 15, 17, and 19-2, 21-2, 23-4, 2, 2, and 3, the Public Official Pension Service approved the plaintiff to receive medical care for official duties as well as the "Type Nos. 1, 4, and 2, 3," and the "Type No. 2, 4, 2, and 3," and the plaintiff was diagnosed in the Type No. 2, 2, 3, 13, 15, 17, and 19-2, 21-2, 23-2, 23-4, 2, and 3, it is reasonable to deem the plaintiff to have obtained the approval of medical care for the combined evidence No. 1, as well as the combined evidence Nos. 2, 2, 3,000.

The defendant's above assertion cannot be accepted.

The decision of the first instance court in the decision is justifiable.

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.