beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
Details of the disposition
In 1980, the Plaintiff was employed by Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Non-Party Co., Ltd.”), but retired after two years. On October 28, 1982, which was six months later, the Plaintiff re-entered into B, and was converted into Non-Party Co., Ltd. on November 1, 1985, and retired on December 31, 2009.
On April 30, 2012, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as the primary lung cancer (hereinafter “instant injury”) at the Ulsan National University Hospital and applied for medical care benefits to the Defendant. However, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-approval for medical care on the ground that the relevance between the instant injury and the Plaintiff’s work cannot be recognized.
(2) The plaintiff's assertion as to the legitimacy of the disposition of this case as to whether the disposition of this case is legitimate or not shall be revoked on a different premise, on the following grounds: (a) there is no dispute; (b) Gap's evidence Nos. 1 and 2; and (c) Eul's evidence Nos. 1 and 1 (including serial numbers); and (d) the plaintiff's assertion as to the legitimacy of the disposition of this case as to whether the disposition of this case is legitimate or not, as a whole, shall be engaged in the possession for not less than 30 years (the prior process of design works, and the removal of melt and foreign substance on the surface of steel) until the non-party company retires from the non-party company (the prior process of design works, and the process of removing melting steel and foreign substance).
In fact, the plaintiff was employed in B, a partner company of the non-party company in November 1, 1985 and was engaged in the work of possession on December 31, 2009, after being transferred to the non-party company under the non-party company's control on November 1, 1985.
The plaintiff's work force was in office in B for about five years from 1980 to October 31, 1985, and he worn a dust-proof horse and his sandbrosting work (this is a processing method to remove unnecessary attached objects, gold, etc. by spraying sand on the surface of a processed product with high voltage).
The plaintiff is in possession of the non-party company from January 1, 1985 until his retirement.