1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On July 10, 1991, the Plaintiff entered a lot and a stock company (hereinafter “sponsing company”) and retired from office on September 30, 1999. On October 1, 1999, the Plaintiff entered a lot company (hereinafter “sponsing company”) and retired from office on May 31, 2001. On June 1, 2001, the Plaintiff retired from office in charge of new business and retired from office on February 28, 2002.

B. Since March 1, 2002, the Plaintiff joined the Defendant and served in the International Office of the Culture Zone Policy Headquarters by October 31, 2009. From January 5, 2010, the Plaintiff served in an overseas business sector injured a corporation. From February 22, 2012, the Plaintiff retired on December 31, 2014.

C. Meanwhile, while holding office under the Defendant, the Plaintiff received interim settlement of retirement allowances for the number of years of continuous service from March 1, 2002 to September 30, 2008, and received interim settlement of retirement allowances for the number of years of continuous service from February 26, 2014 to January 31, 2014.

[Reasons for Recognition] Uncontentious Facts, Gap evidence 1 to 5, Eul evidence 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion was transferred to an affiliate regardless of the Plaintiff’s intent as a result of the Plaintiff’s personnel issuance of a lot group from July 10, 1991 to December 31, 2014, after the Plaintiff joined the lot system, until the Defendant retired from the Defendant. Since labor relations within the lot group continue to exist without being severed, the Defendant paid retirement allowances for the period of service under the Defendant even though the Plaintiff entered the lot system and paid retirement allowances for the entire service years from the date of retirement to the date of retirement. As such, the Defendant is obligated to pay 20,010,000 among the difference, as part of the difference, and delay damages therefrom.

3. Determination

A. When a worker of the relevant legal doctrine moves from the previous company to its affiliated company, it is unilateral in accordance with the management policy of the previous company.