logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.06.16 2016고단2204
주민등록법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Resident Registration Act;

A. On July 10, 2015, around 00:38, the Defendant was found to have violated signal and was asked to present a driver’s license from the control police officer while driving the E Cost Sheet in front of the convenience store in the south-gu Incheon Metropolitan City B.

The defendant stated that the above police officer did not have a driver's license, and the defendant stated that he did not have a driver's license.

Accordingly, the defendant used another person's resident registration number unlawfully.

B. On August 18, 2015, around 07:30 on August 18, 2015, the Defendant: (a) discovered a violation of signal while driving the said Lone Star Company G in front of the company in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City; and (b) was requested by the control police officer to present a driver’s license; and (c) sought a driver’s license in the same manner as the above 1-A resident registration number.

Accordingly, the defendant used another person's resident registration number unlawfully.

2. Counterfeiting a private signature;

A. At the date and time, place, and place of the above 1-A, the Defendant signed as if the Defendant was F, who was demanded by the controlling police officer to electronically sign a notice of payment of signal violations penalty.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged another person’s signature for the purpose of exercising the right.

B. The Defendant, at the time and place of the foregoing 1-B, signed the Defendant’s signature as if the Defendant was F, demanding the police officer to electronically sign a notice of payment of signal violations penalty.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged another person’s signature for the purpose of exercising the right.

3. Exercising signatures on the above investigation;

A. The Defendant: (a) presented the signature of the F forged as stated above to the police officer who was aware of the forgery at the time, at the place, and at the place, as stated in the above 1-A; and (b) exercised the signature of the F

B. The Defendant: (a) presented the signature of the F forged as if it was duly formed to the police officer who was aware of the forgery at the time, at the time, at the place, and at the place, as mentioned in the above 1-B.

Summary of Evidence

1...

arrow