1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 434,618,91; and (b) KRW 20 million to Plaintiff C; and (c) KRW 5 million to Plaintiff B and D, respectively.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The occurrence of an accident (hereinafter “instant accident”) occurred on August 2, 2016, E driving a FF Freight Vehicle owned by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant Vehicle”) on the 06:48 square meters (hereinafter “Defendant Vehicle”) and driving a two-lane road back to 908-4, the Dozye-myeon-gun, the Dozye-myeon-gun, the Dozye-myeon-gun, the Dozye-si, and at the time, the Plaintiff Company A was driving G-wheeled Vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) in front of the Defendant Vehicle. While the central line of the road is yellow-ray, E is unable to operate a vehicle beyond the central line, even if the central line of the road is operated beyond the center line, E continued to shock the left part of the Plaintiff Company’s vehicle to the right side of the Defendant Vehicle, which was sought to turn back to the village, and Plaintiff A’s spouse’s 10 meters away and Plaintiff C 10 meters suffered injury to Plaintiff A’s spouse.

3) The Defendant is an insurer which has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the Defendant vehicle (the fact that there is no dispute over grounds for recognition, entries in Gap evidence 1 through 5, and evidence 7, and the purport of the whole pleadings).

B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case as the insurer of the defendant vehicle.

C. The main responsibility for the occurrence of an accident restricting the responsibility lies on the Defendant’s vehicle, which goes beyond the yellow domin line for overtaking the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and is proceeding on the left side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle but failed to properly examine the movement of the Plaintiff’

(The part where the defendant's vehicle collisions with the plaintiff's vehicle is the left-hand side of the driver's seat of the plaintiff's vehicle. However, the accident occurred because the plaintiff's driver's seat and left-hand turn while driving the two-wheeled vehicle, but did not look at the surroundings.