1. The defendant shall be concurrently the plaintiff's 2,830,052 won, won, and the plaintiff's deceased deceased Gap's her lawsuit acceptance as the plaintiff's lawsuit acceptance.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. On April 26, 2014, JK 1), G caused an accident (hereinafter “instant accident”), around 11:54, when driving H vehicles on April 26, 2014, conflict with the right side of A driver’s I-wheel (hereinafter “original vehicle”) who was directly driving on the right side of A-wheel-dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul at the right side of the right side of the A-wheel-dong (hereinafter “original vehicle”). Accordingly, A suffered injury, such as the so-called so-called so-called so-called “I-wheel-do”). A died on December 8, 2017 while the instant lawsuit was pending (the instant accident is not related to the instant accident), and the Plaintiffs are children of the deceased Party.

Plaintiff

E on October 25, 2018, from D, co-inheritors acquired the claim corresponding to D's inheritance shares among the damage claims against the deceased defendant against D, and D withdrawn from the lawsuit of this case.

3) The Defendant is an insurer which has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the Defendant vehicle. [The fact that there is no dispute over grounds for recognition, entries in Gap evidence 1, 2, and 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings.]

B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for the damage suffered by the deceased A due to the instant accident as the insurer of the defendant vehicle.

C. The primary responsibility for the occurrence of an accident limiting liability is that the movement of the Plaintiff’s vehicle (which has priority to road traffic) in which the Defendant’s vehicle, who combines the Defendant’s vehicle into the 4th parallel line from the combined road, was not properly examined.

However, considering the parts of the vehicle collision, even though the defendant's vehicle entered the area at the joint mooring point, the driver's negligence of the network A, which conflict with the part of the defendant's vehicle, was caused by the accident of this case.

Considering these circumstances, the defendant's liability ratio is limited to 70%.

2. Except as otherwise provided under the scope of the net A’s liability, each statement of damages calculation shall be as follows.

The period of time for the convenience of calculation shall be monthly.