beta
Text
1. The Defendant: KRW 16,00,000 for each of the KRW 38,969,820 for Plaintiff A, Plaintiff B, C, and D, and each of them on May 16, 2013.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The plaintiff A is the wife of the deceased F (hereinafter "the deceased"), and the plaintiff B, C, and D are the children of the deceased.
B. When the Defendant, like the Deceased, was unable to enter the farmland by asserting ownership of access roads to the farmland owned by the Defendant, as between the deceased and the deceased, and H settled in the Kuk-si G by the deceased, the Defendant took all responsibility for raising H to the deceased, who was at the time G area, and had been paying time expenses for several years.
On May 15, 2013, the Defendant: (a) caused a dispute with the Deceased for the foregoing reasons; and (b) took a brupt pesticide disease, which is a class II (highly toxic) Kamermbrate agricultural pest, in the Defendant’s residence; and (c) caused the Deceased to inhale the brupt into and from his noses; and (d) caused the Deceased to die on June 16, 2013 by taking advantage of the bruptism.
C. After the Defendant was prosecuted for committing murder due to the foregoing act, the Defendant asserted that he was guilty of committing murder, and that he did not forced the Deceased to commit a pesticide disease. However, on January 16, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a 12-year conviction of imprisonment for the reason that the Defendant was found to have caused the Deceased to die by neglecting the pesticide disease (this Court 2013Gohap44), and the Defendant appealed from the appeal, but the judgment dismissing the appeal and the judgment dismissing the appeal became final and conclusive.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of evidence A1 to 4, purport of the whole pleadings
2. According to the facts acknowledged prior to the occurrence of the liability for damages, the Defendant is liable for the damages suffered by the Plaintiffs, who are the deceased and their family members, due to the murder of the deceased (hereinafter “instant tort”).
The defendant does not allow the deceased to inhale agrochemicals because the agrochemicals inhaled by the deceased are different from those of marina agrochemicals.