logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.08.18 2016가합4463
손해배상금 청구의 소
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 231,034,880 for each of the Plaintiff A and B, and KRW 20,000,00 for each of them from July 22, 2016.

Reasons

The defendant's tort committed by the defendant at around 08:10 on July 22, 2016, at the defendant's residence located in 08:0, 3:302, he discovered and replaced the net F (hereinafter referred to as "the deceased"), which walked in the second apartment, through windows during smoking, while smoking tobacco, and tried to kill the deceased with the kitchen knife (the total length of 32 cm, 12 cm) which is located in the kitchen.

At around 08:13 on the same day, the defendant put the kitchen knife in the front of the deceased, and put in G, which is a resting space for the residents of the above E Apartment 2 side of the deceased, in the right side of the deceased, Dale to the deceased, "at all times," and "at all times," and after smoking tobacco, the kitchen knife the part of the part of the part of the part of the deceased's right side side of the deceased in the front side of the deceased, and continued to have knife once.

immediately after that, the Deceased, the Defendant, following the Deceased's back, the rear part of the Deceased's timber, the right shoulder, and the winter, etc., have reached knife in several times by the kitchen knife.

Accordingly, the defendant killed the deceased by causing the deceased to die from a low-flost shock show caused by light stude, etc. on the front side of the above E apartment at around 08:30 on the same day.

On August 5, 2016, the Defendant was charged with murdering on the ground that the Jeonju District Court 2016Kahap118 (hereinafter referred to as the above) committed the murdering of the deceased.

As the heir of the deceased in inheritance relationship, there are plaintiffs A, B, and C, who are parents.

【In light of the above-mentioned facts without any dispute, each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 8 (including virtual numbers), and the purport of the entire pleadings, the defendant was a tortfeasor who intentionally killed the deceased, resulting in the death of the deceased and his heir.

arrow