1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged by considering Gap evidence Nos. 1, 5, 6, 15 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 1, 8, 11, 14, 15, 24 through 29, and the whole purport of each document sent to the Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office of Seoul.

Plaintiff

and related companies 1) Industrial Pio Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Industrial Pio)

) The character is a company incorporated in Japan for the purpose of the character commercialization project, and is a character, such as Chat, Chat, Chat, Simls and pumps, etc. (hereinafter referred to as a “sanio character”).

(i) the copyright holder, and Istain Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Astaints”)

) The right to manufacture products using a scenario character from a scenario and sell and distribute them (hereinafter referred to as "commercialization right").

(i)As assigned, A.I.T.T. Doese re-grants its commercialization rights to third parties (hereinafter referred to as “A.I.T.T.T. Doese”), the third parties granted the right to commercialization of A.I.T. Doese from A.I.T. Doz;

[] In return, a master-use company (hereinafter “A”) that entered into a contract for permission of commercialization rights with the content that shall pay a certain amount of the royalties received from Slouses to Slouses is a master-use company. 2) A (hereinafter “A”) for the purpose of manufacturing, distributing, etc. character products is granted the obligee’s right to commercialization of character from Auseuses, and then the Plaintiff, the representative director of which was appointed by the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2011 Congress 172 on December 22, 2011.

B. Trade A between A and the Defendant ordered the production of goods, such as phrases, from May 2009 to October 201, 201, and the Defendant supplied the goods to A during that period.