1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship between the parties 1) The Warsaw C (C Co., Ltd. hereinafter “C”) (hereinafter “C”).

Defendant D (hereinafter referred to as “D”) is the copyright holder of the character E, etc.

(2) On October 24, 2000, the Plaintiff F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “F”) changed from “AB” to “AB” on April 7, 200 for the manufacture, etc. of character products on behalf of Defendant C, and changed from “AB” to “AB” on February 2, 2010, and merged I into “AB” on October 24, 2000, and was decided to commence the decision to commence the rehabilitation procedure on December 22, 201.

B. From 1998 to 2007, F was engaged in F’s business 1) From 1998 to 2007, F had obtained re-permission for the commercialization of character with respect to a certain item from Defendant D and paid 70% of the license to Defendant D by discovering and introducing the character commercialization right to Defendant D from 2004 to December 31, 2007.

4) From 200 to 200, F, while operating a J character store, sold imported goods and products produced by the F or Scrobro, and there was a dispute between the parties with respect to the content of the Scro license’s business, as seen after the Scro license business from 2002 in order to diversify the handling goods in the store and resolve inventory. C, around October 30, 2007, F and Defendant C established the Plaintiff as a joint equity investment on the part of October 30, 2007.