1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 1, 200, the Plaintiff was appointed as public officials in Grade 9 in extraordinary local civil service, and served in the water service headquarters B office of Daejeon Metropolitan City from January 21, 2013, and was promoted to the local administrative assistant on December 12, 2013.

B. On November 6, 2014, the Defendant, following the resolution of the Personnel Committee of Daejeon Metropolitan City on November 13, 2014, issued a disciplinary measure for three months of salary reduction in accordance with Article 10(1) of the Local Public Officials Discipline and Appeal Regulations to the Plaintiff on the following grounds.

On December 16, 2013, at around 20:20, the Plaintiff was sentenced to a summary order from Daejeon District Court on March 7, 2014, on the ground that: (a) the Plaintiff: (b) had a direct superior of D, who had been on night duty at the water supply headquarters B office of Daejeon Daejeon Daejeon Metropolitan City, for the reason that he had a duty division in the process of organizing the work division following the personnel assignment of new female employees; (c) opened the watchkeeping to the watchkeeping room; and (d) opened a door to the watchkeeping room; and (d) had other hand take a bath, and had D take a bath with other hand, and had D take a bridge while going beyond the invasion; and (d) was sentenced to a fine for obstruction of performance of official duties by the Prosecutor’s Office on March 7, 2014; and (d) requested for a summary order from Daejeon District Court to be sentenced to a fine of KRW 200,000,000 as a result of a summary order.

The plaintiff's above act shall be subject to one month of suspension from office as he/she violates the duty to obey Article 49 of the Local Public Officials Act and the duty to maintain dignity under Article 55 of the Local Public Officials Act, but he/she shall be punished by imprisonment with labor for three months

- - Sound

C. On December 2, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a petition review with the appeals review committee of the Daejeon Metropolitan City. On February 6, 2015, the appeals review committee of the Daejeon Metropolitan City on the ground that “Although it is not recognized that the Plaintiff inflicted an injury on his/her superior or breached the duty to obey, the Plaintiff breached the duty to maintain dignity by assaulting abusively against his/her superior.”