logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.11.28 2013고단3579
자동차손해배상보장법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 28, 2012, the Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act: (a) operated the Defendant’s B TNXG car at the first bridge intersection located in the region north-dong of the wife population at Chicago-si on November 28, 2012, which was not mandatory insurance.

2. At around 03:50 on November 28, 2012, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the Road Traffic Act (Unlicensed Driving) and the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter “Road Traffic Act”), when driving the said TraXG car without a driver’s license and making a left-hand turn to the port of the port of the port of port office at the port of Mabbro Hospital, the first bridge crossing in the area north of the wife population at the port of the port of Mabrop Hospital at the port of Mabrop Hospital at the port of the port of Mabrop, the Defendant, without a driver’s license, followed the Victim C (Nam, 29 years old)’s car by negligence in the course of driving in violation of the signal, with the air

The Defendant, by these occupational negligence, damaged the victims E (Nam, South Korea, and 29 years old), who were on board the said benz car, by taking approximately two weeks of medical treatment, such as catitis and satch fat, etc., requiring approximately three weeks of medical treatment, and damaged the said benz car by taking about KRW 64,88,138 of the repair cost to the victims F (F) who was on board the said catzG car.

3. When the police officers dispatched to the scene demand the presentation of a driver’s license, the Defendant illegally displayed official document by presenting a G driver’s license.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol of suspect examination of G police officers;

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. Mandatory insurance policies;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 46(2)2 and Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act concerning criminal facts; Article 3(1), the proviso of Article 3(2)1 and 7 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents; Article 268 of the Criminal Act; Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act; and the Road Traffic Act.

arrow