Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a marina business in the Southern-gu second floor in Gwangju-gu, 5 studio, a shower room, and a shower room, with the trade name of "C".

On December 10, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 20:40 on December 10, 2013, the Defendant: (b) sought KRW 80,00 as the price for each sex trafficking from the elderly and the customers; and (c) had the female employees (alias E and F) in the said place do the act of similarity with the male guest’s sexual organ.

As a result, the defendant had employed female workers engage in sexual traffic with customers, thereby doing acts such as arranging sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police interrogation protocol of G and H:

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. As to Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act, Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (Evidence 3 (Cor Sea) of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, etc., the defendant asserts that he did not use the mixed Sea, and G, which was engaged in the act of similarity at the defendant's business, only possessed for personal use at the place of business, and is another woman who was not another woman who committed the act of similarity, and it is not used at the place of business. Thus, it is difficult to view the seized mixed Sea as an object which was provided or intended to be provided to the criminal act). The social harm caused by the mediation of the act of similarity in sentencing, which is not significant, may be deemed to have been caused by the defendant, and the amount of fine determined by the summary order cannot be deemed to have been excessive in consideration of the fact that G not 20 years of age was committed by the defendant, and the equity with similar cases.