1. On December 9, 2013, the Defendant’s visit to the Plaintiff’s non-conformity of the requirements for persons rendering distinguished services to the State.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On November 24, 2008, the Plaintiff was discharged from military service as a noncommissioned officer after having entered the Army, and was discharged from military service as of March 12, 2013.

B. The Plaintiff filed an application for registration with the Defendant on May 14, 2013, on the ground that he/she was diagnosed as “the instant wounds” in the National Armed Forces Chuncheon Hospital (hereinafter “the instant wounds”).

C. On December 9, 2013, the Defendant rendered a disposition rejecting a person who has rendered distinguished service to the State or a person eligible for veteran’s compensation (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the instant wound was not directly related to the national defense, security, etc., and that there is no causal link between the instant wound and the military performance of official duties.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, entry of Eul Nos. 1 and 4, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. On May 2009, the Plaintiff asserted that: (a) during the course of the training of a noncommissioned officer in a school of noncommissioned officers, the Plaintiff was treated at a military hospital due to the recurrence of a hond in which the right dog was deprived of, and the honding hond in the state where he was under first-aid treatment but was not completely treated; and (b) after the ponding of the mond, the Plaintiff received treatment at the military hospital. On August 18, 2009, after the monding of the mond, the Plaintiff got a group of moths from the appointed noncommissioned officers who had been employed around the monding of August 18, 2009; and (c) there

Therefore, the difference in this case existed a causal relationship with the military performance of official duties, and the defendant's disposition of this case is unlawful.

(b) as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes;

C. In fact, the Plaintiff entered the Army on November 24, 2008 and was undergoing training at a school of noncommissioned Officers on May 2009 after entering the Army.

The symptoms of the right-hand dog spathy, the body dog spathy, the body dog spathy, the body dog spathy, and the body dog spathy, and the above spathy.