A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

On October 10, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to five years in Seoul High Court to imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud), and the judgment was finalized on January 16, 2014, and operated E weddings in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D from October 5, 2009.

Before the operation of the wedding hall, the Defendant: (a) while operating the wedding hall in Namyang-si, Namyang-si; (b) was unable to pay wages for ten months to employees; and (c) was seized, the Defendant prepared an overview of the wedding hall in which approximately KRW 20 billion was entered, including the interior construction cost and building lease deposit; (b) the Defendant was loaned from the new bank amounting to KRW 3 billion; (c) the Defendant was paid KRW 8 billion in personal debt such as bonds; (d) KRW 4.4 billion out of the building lease deposit of KRW 10 billion; and (e) on October 2009, it was extremely not good for the financial situation, such as the overdue monthly at the time of opening the wedding hall, up to KRW 1 billion.

1. On August 2009, the Defendant against the victim H: (a) at the model office of the wedding hall in Franman on August 1, 2009, the Defendant: (b) “E wedding hall was leased from the owner of the building to KRW 10 billion; (c) paid in full the deposit amount of KRW 10 billion; and (d) the interior facility was completed; and (e) it was anticipated to open the facility around September 2009. The lease deposit amount of KRW 100 million was reduced for the outdoor photographing; (b) the return security against the failure to receive the deposit amount of KRW 100 million at the expiration of the lease term; (c) the return security against the land and building of JAD would set up a collateral security on the land and building of the private teaching institute, the security value of which is adequate for the payment of the deposit amount of KRW 120,000,000 from KRW 1.8 billion at the time of photographing the facility.”

However, in fact, the Defendant is not in a good condition and does not normally operate a wedding, so even if he receives a deposit from the victim.