logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2012.08.17 2011나6801
부당이득금
Text

1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

The defendant is the plaintiffs other than the plaintiff AI, AZ, and BO.

Reasons

(5) All of the charges for the installation of a 460,00,000 square meters and packing facilities: (1): 65,39,00,000 won for all of the charges: (6) the amount obtained by multiplying the total incidental construction expenses by the ratio of basic facilities: 3,628,385,150 x 18,818,618,307, 148 x 1607 x 07 x 1607 x 16,000 x 406 x 07 x 07 x : All of the charges for the installation of a 060-1,000 x 06 x 05 x 07 x 06 x 16605 x : 506 x 07 x 1605 x 07 x 1605 x 06 - 3010

However, the above metropolitan transport facilities do not mean that the Defendant constructs but are traffic facilities that Gyeonggi-do formulates an implementation plan for measures to improve metropolitan transport in accordance with the former Special Act on the Management of Intercity Transport in Metropolitan Areas (hereinafter “former Intercity Transport Act”) and build separately outside the instant project district.

It is not a transportation facility that connects transportation facilities outside the project district in the project district.

arrow