1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000;

2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On June 25, 2014, the defendant is a person who has been punished for violating the Trademark Act by regulating the Daejeon District Police Agency.

No person shall deliver, sell, forge, imitate or possess, for the purpose of transferring or delivering goods identical with or similar to the designated goods on which another person’s registered trademark or any other trademark similar thereto is used.

피고인은 2014. 9. 1.부터 2014. 10. 14.까지 인터넷 사이트인 네이버 ‘중고나라’ 에 샤넬, 구찌, 루이비통 등 위조된 해외유명 상표가 부착된 가방 등을 ‘샤넬가방, 구찌가방, 새상품 완전저렴 3만원부터’, ‘루이비통머니클럽, 몽블랑, 보테가베네타, 샤넬지갑 새상품 완전저렴’ 이라는 제목으로 광고를 한 후, 불특정인들에게 루이비똥(등록번호 059471)상표가 부착된 가짜 가방 5점(정품시가 9,000,000원), 샤넬(등록번호 071324)상표가 부착된 가짜 가방 3점(정품시가 9,000,000원), 구찌 상표(등록번호 070352호)가 부착된 가짜 가방 2점(정품시가 2,400,000원)등 총 10점(판매시가 300,000원, 정품시가 20,400,000원)을 판매하고, 루이비똥 가방, 지갑 등 81개를 판매할 목적으로 소지하여 상표권을 각 침해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Police seizure records;

1. B written self-statements;

1. A list of letters posted on "Ninna", Ninna, Ninna;

1. Taking photographs of the contents of text;

1. A으로부터 구입한 가짜 샤넬 가방 사진 촬영 법령의 적용

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and Article 93 of the Trademark Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 97-2 (1) of the Trademark Act (No. 1 through 12) of the Confiscation Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act [the scope of sentencing] Article 334(1) of the order of provisional payment [the sentence] is disadvantageous to a fine not exceeding KRW 100 million (the decision of sentence]: it is advantageous to the fact