beta
Text
Defendant
Imprisonment with prison labor for A and one year, six months, and six months, and six months, respectively.
However, the defendant B.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On March 12, 2012, the Defendant was awarded a contract for a new construction of a factory (hereinafter “E”) with E (hereinafter “E”) on the condition that “the construction cost shall be paid after completion and shall be waived at the request of E” in an industrial complex created at Asan-si. However, the Defendant was unable to pay construction cost, etc. to the subcontractor due to the failure to receive the construction cost, and was willing to receive the joint investment in the “F” and “G” companies that intend to newly construct a factory within the same industrial complex, and received the down payment and pay the construction cost to the subcontractor companies of E (hereinafter “E”).
On June 11, 2012, the Defendant is currently constructing the E-factory immediately adjacent to the site where F is seeking to build a new factory at the main office of the company located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu., and the victim M is an actual operator of the company.
For the new construction of a factory, there is a facility that has been used as an existing construction work in order to require infrastructure such as a site office and a toilet.
The contract for this construction was entered into with the false statement that the construction cost of KRW 74 million will be the new construction of a factory and a dormitory (hereinafter referred to as “this construction”).
However, the Defendant had no particular property after the Defendant was exempted from the liability for bankruptcy in 2010, and performed the construction in an unreasonable manner after entering into the contract under the above condition as seen above with E, and had already ceased the construction due to the difficulty in procuring construction costs on May 2012. Even if the Defendant received the down payment from the injured party, it was thought that it would be appropriated for the repayment of approximately KRW 200,000,000 for the total amount of the construction cost to the subcontractor incurred in connection with the construction, so there was no intention or ability to normally
As such, the Defendant deceivings the victim company, and belongs to it on June 14, 2012.