1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff’s determination as to the claim was based on the Plaintiff’s father’s father’s ownership of B 321m2, C. 86m2, D 18m2, and E road 10m2. From December 197 to December 321m2, the Defendant asserted that the Plaintiff was liable to pay the Plaintiff the amount of money calculated as unjust enrichment from 300m2, C. 86m2, and D 18m2, in sequence, the portion of “1” among the 321m2 in the attached Form No. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 10m2, which are connected with each of the 321m2, Jeonbuk-gun, Jeonbuk-gun, Seoul, and D 18m2, and the amount of money calculated as unjust enrichment from 300m2,000 to 301m2,000,000 won.

However, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the Defendant occupied the land of this case and used it for agriculture, and the Plaintiff’s assertion is without merit without further examination.

2. In conclusion, the claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.