logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.05.16 2017구단61495
공무상요양추가상병일부불승인취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff, as a teacher affiliated with the Daegu Metropolitan City Office of Education, was at school on October 5, 2014 (hereinafter “instant accident”), is a person who provided medical treatment for official duties from October 5, 2014 to December 10, 2016 (798) by suffering from “a multi-fluoral fluorries (6 and 7 on the opposite side), including clocks and tensions, cluoral damage, thredrhosis, and two crehal creh damage.”

B. The Plaintiff applied for an additional injury or disease with respect to “adaptive disorder, external stress disorder, chronronronronon, the right high-level salt, the right-hand chronon, the right-hand chrononitis, salted, and the fluoral fladism.”

C. On February 13, 2017, the Defendant rendered a disposition not to file an application for additional injury and disease (hereinafter “instant disposition”) with respect to “In the instant injury and disease” (hereinafter “instant injury and disease”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The main point of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that there is a proximate causal relation with the instant accident, and thus, the instant disposition that rejected the application for additional injury and disease as to the instant injury and disease was unlawful.

B. According to the following facts acknowledged by the court’s entrustment of appraisal of medical records to the head of the Seoul Medical Center, it is difficult to acknowledge the proximate causal relationship between the instant superior branch and the instant accident, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Therefore, the instant disposition is lawful.

1) Medical opinions (i) regarding the evaluation of medical records, there is a possibility that a fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluor

However, this appraisal proposal has a substantial difference between traffic accident and commuting diagnosis and treatment.

arrow