beta
Text
Defendant
A and B shall be punished by imprisonment for one year, and by imprisonment for six months, respectively.
However, from the date when this judgment has become final.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendants, who intentionally caused a traffic accident, concluded that they will obtain insurance proceeds by receiving the accident from an insurance company. On July 9, 2016, the roads near the third-party street in Songpa-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, 05:32, Defendant B driven an E UA6 car, Defendant C intentionally caused a traffic accident by driving the FUA6 car, Defendant A driven the FUHG car, and Defendant A intentionally caused an accident by receiving the accident from the behind the said AU6 car. At that time, Defendant A filed a claim for insurance proceeds by pretending that the said accident was an contingent traffic accident.
However, at the time of fact, the Defendants intentionally caused a traffic accident due to the need of personal living expenses, etc. and intended to get out insurance money by pretending to be a contingent traffic accident.
As a result, the Defendants conspired, by deceiving the employees of the damage insurance company, received total of KRW 7,970,000 from the above insurance company employees to receive insurance money, etc.
2. Defendant B, Defendant C’s G, and H’s joint crime with the above intent to obtain insurance proceeds by intentionally causing a traffic accident as described in G and H. According to the direction of Defendant B, Defendant C, G, and H were to receive insurance proceeds by pretending that the said accident was a contingency accident, around July 23, 2016, around 07:07, at the direction of Defendant B, Defendant C, and G, and H were to drive the I Car with the I Car, while driving the I Car with the said I Car. Defendant C intentionally caused a traffic accident by intentionally receiving the I Car from the following behind the I Car car. At that time, Defendant C claimed insurance proceeds by pretending that the said accident was a contingency accident.
However, in fact, the Defendants, G, and H intentionally do so.