1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the plaintiff at the court of first instance is not different from the argument in the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance rejecting the plaintiff's claim, even if the evidence submitted at the court of first instance is examined again along with the plaintiff's assertion, is justified.

Therefore, the reasoning for this court concerning this case is that the "second-stage contract" of the first instance judgment No. 2) No. 1 of the second instance judgment is "second-stage competition"; the second-stage "not less than two" is "not less than two"; the second-stage "Attachment 2" is "Attachment 2"; Article 76 "B" and "4. 31. 31. 4. 30" (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 4. 30. 4. 30).

ii)‘B’, 6.1’, 1.00,000,00

ii)‘B’, ‘B’, the evidence 19’ 23 of the 19th Administration’ (including paper numbers), ‘B’ (including paper numbers), ‘B’, the court’ in the first instance court of the 20th instance, ‘B’, and the 7th page 14’ on April 31, 2016, ‘B’ (including paper numbers).

4. seems to be a clerical error in 30.

Inasmuch as the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the first instance, it is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.