logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
red_flag_2
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2012. 7. 19. 선고 2012나9392 판결
[소유권보존등기말소][미간행]
Plaintiff and appellant

Plaintiff (Attorney Yoon Sung-sung et al., Counsel for plaintiff-appellant)

Defendant, Appellant

Defendant 1 and 16 others (Law Firm Dong, Attorneys Kim Hong-chul, Counsel for the defendant-appellant)

The first instance judgment

Seoul Central District Court Decision 201Gadan192005 Decided January 11, 2012

Conclusion of Pleadings

June 21, 2012

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the court of first instance is revoked. The Defendants will implement the procedure for the cancellation of registration of the registration of the preservation of ownership completed on March 16, 1965 with respect to the pertinent shares in the attached inheritance shares table among the real estate listed in the attached list to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning of this Court’s reasoning is the same as that of the part concerning the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this Court cites it as it is in accordance with the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act (it is not different from the judgment of the court of first instance, the fact-finding and judgment, considering the respective descriptions of evidence No. 9-1 and No. 2 submitted

2. Conclusion

Therefore, all of the plaintiff's claims shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal against the defendants shall be dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

[Attachment]

Judges Kim Tae-sung (Presiding Judge)

arrow