A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] The Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for habitual fraud at the Incheon District Court on July 16, 2015, and the judgment was finalized on September 14, 2015, and the execution of the sentence was completed at the Incheon Detention Center on November 2, 2015.

"2015 Highest 3509"

1. On November 9, 2015, the Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s duties, on the grounds that drinking alcohol at the E main shop operated by the victim D, who is located in the Won-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seoul, would drink, and that the table table table table is flick, he flicked with glass, and flicked with a large interest of the table table and partitions, and flicked with the victim, thereby hindering the victim’s main shop business by force, thereby obstructing the victim’s main shop business.

2. The Defendant damaged property by destroying property, on the same ground as the description in paragraph 1 at the same time and place as that in paragraph 1, the Defendant diversating mebbs and partitions glass and destroying the victim’s property by shouldering mebbs in the unclaimed market price, which is the victim D’s ownership.

3. In spite of the absence of the intent or ability to pay the price at the same date and time as stated in paragraph 1, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim D as if he were to pay the price, was provided with alcoholic beverages of an amount equivalent to 61,000 won at the market price from the damaged person.

On January 23, 2016, the Defendant, “2016 Highest 168, 2016, the Defendant, on January 23, 2016, 2016, stolen one of the beef meat fats equivalent to KRW 3,500, the victim H owned by the Defendant, who was displayed in each site, by pretending customers within the G convenience store located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul.

"2016 Highest 175"

1. On December 13, 2015, the Defendant ordered alcohol and alcohol as if the Defendant would pay the victim’s normal drinking value in the package mar of the “K” vehicle operated by the injured party J of the Young-si, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

However, the facts did not have the intention or ability to pay the drinking value even if they were provided by the injured person.

The Defendant is identical to this.